Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Cain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheryl Cain

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this person passes WP:NBIO, also this is pretty much unreferenced, so WP:BLP is also an issue. Deprodded by User:Dennisdosestuff wiki with a non-helpful edit summary "personal life" (minor edit). ?? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete since the only thing that could be a source is IMDb, which is not reliable to create articles. Script writers for TV episodes generally are not considered notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but not speedy. I disagree with JPL in two ways: First, I think a reasonable number of TV screenwriters can be notable, for instance as winners of the Writers Guild of America Awards (but certainly not merely by having written episodes that were produced). And second, I think that being a screenwriter for an episode of a well-known production can be enough of a claim of notability to avoid speedy deletion. But in this case, I am unable to find in-depth coverage of her that would pass WP:GNG. And certainly giving up on screenwriting to become an English teacher at an international school is unlikely to lead to WP:PROF or any other kind of notability for that aspect of her life. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:47, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Zero impact on the academic world. No in-depth sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Delete I couldn't find anything about her in the databases I have access to. There's not enough to pass GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.